<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash Player 11.1 and AIR 3.1 available!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flashinside.net/flash-player-11-1-and-air-3-1-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flashinside.net/flash-player-11-1-and-air-3-1-available/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=flash-player-11-1-and-air-3-1-available</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berkay</title>
		<link>http://www.flashinside.net/flash-player-11-1-and-air-3-1-available/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Berkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashinside.net/?p=689#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that Flash as a web pneresce will decline and be left to mass-market to produce. The mobile choice is a logical one   Lee does clarify it well and makes a good point. As we move on, most of us are having to face the HTML / Flash website building all over again, like we did years ago when Flash was still  new  (ish). The Flash experience is still great for desktops (and I don&#039;t see AIR packaged apps for these kinds of experiences), and the HTML experience will just be left for mobile devices.Games are a prime example of why I don&#039;t think Flash usage on the web will decline, at least not significantly enough. Look at almost any game on Facebook   they&#039;re all built within the Flash platform and are generating tremendous amounts of revenue for both start-ups and established businesses. As we&#039;re still utilizing desktops, packaging Flash games in AIR for web use doesn&#039;t make sense as we&#039;ve been experiencing more and more in-browser tools &amp; applications, where Flash fits in perfectly.I do however believe that ActionScripters will be less focused and involved as a community. And that&#039;s a real shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Flash as a web pneresce will decline and be left to mass-market to produce. The mobile choice is a logical one   Lee does clarify it well and makes a good point. As we move on, most of us are having to face the HTML / Flash website building all over again, like we did years ago when Flash was still  new  (ish). The Flash experience is still great for desktops (and I don&#8217;t see AIR packaged apps for these kinds of experiences), and the HTML experience will just be left for mobile devices.Games are a prime example of why I don&#8217;t think Flash usage on the web will decline, at least not significantly enough. Look at almost any game on Facebook   they&#8217;re all built within the Flash platform and are generating tremendous amounts of revenue for both start-ups and established businesses. As we&#8217;re still utilizing desktops, packaging Flash games in AIR for web use doesn&#8217;t make sense as we&#8217;ve been experiencing more and more in-browser tools &amp; applications, where Flash fits in perfectly.I do however believe that ActionScripters will be less focused and involved as a community. And that&#8217;s a real shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
